Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Vessel propelling through water
Video of vessel with motor, propellers, and battery moving through the water
Testing
![]() |
| model in water to make sure it is balanced and floats |
![]() |
| model in water with weight of MM's camera apparatus |
![]() |
| vessel in water tank: floats and does not sit too far in the water |
![]() |
| top view of vessel in water with out any of the motors or other components |
![]() |
| vessel in water with motors, propellers, and battery |
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Construction
![]() |
| Top: Measuring the side of my vessel 2nd: Final model of my vessel Third: final rendered CAD drawing of my vessel Bottom:The pieces for my vessel not yet put together; with the angle measurer |
![]() |
| The wood slides into the grooves made so that the vessel is more watertight with less seams. |
![]() |
| propeller from the RC boat |
![]() |
| RC motor components |
![]() |
| RC motor components |
![]() |
| RC propellers |
![]() |
| inside of RC boat; blue cooling tube on the left |
![]() |
| motors, propellers, and battery out of boat |
![]() |
| left: frame for bottom of vessel that I had to remake (right) because the wood was splitting through |
![]() |
| spray painting frame for bottom of vessel in systems shop |
![]() |
| vessel all put together and painted with glass bottom sitting in bottom |
![]() |
| plexiglass bottom for vessel: I removed the protective sheet from just the perimeter so that the center of it would not get ruined |
![]() |
| vessel with plexiglass attached to the bottom and the frame overtop of it and the caulked seems |
| |
| The pieces fit into each other perfectly so that they are secure and stable. |
Sunday, October 31, 2010
Developmental Work
![]() |
| Isometric View of Vessel |
| Orthographic View- front of vessel |
| Orthographic View- side of vessel |
| Orthographic View- top of vessel |
SUPPLY LIST
Item | Description | QTY | Size | Remarks |
1 | Glue | 1 | 16 oz | Titebond II wood glue (waterproof) |
2 | Sandpaper | 2 | 4”x8” sheet | Material forming |
3 | Clear Wood Finish | 1 | 1 gallon | Vessel finish |
TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT LIST
Item | Description | Use |
1 | Band Saw | Cut out pieces for vessel |
2 | Ruler | Measure out pieces for vessel |
3 | Pencil | Mark wood for vessel |
MATERIALS LIST
Item | Description | QTY | Size | Remarks |
1 | Plywood | 1 | 2’x4’ sheet | Vessel body |
2 | Plexiglass | 1 | 4”x6” sheet | Vessel bottom |
3 | Motor | 1 | Standard | |
4 | Battery | 1 | Power source of vessel |
Plan of Procedures
The project being created following these steps is a remote control glass bottom vessel. This vessel will be able to be operated from shore during harsh weather to view underwater benthic creatures.
The project being created following these steps is a remote control glass bottom vessel. This vessel will be able to be operated from shore during harsh weather to view underwater benthic creatures.
· Measure out and mark the wood to the appropriate sizes for the pieces of the vessel
· Cut each piece of wood following your measured out guide lines and sand the edges of each piece so that the edges are smooth
· Glue the side pieces of wood together
· Glue the bottom frame to the bottom of the side piece of the vessel
· Let the glue completely dry for at least 24 hours
· Paint the clear wood finishing over the entire vessel
· Let the vessel completely dry for at least 24 hours
· Glue in the sheet of pexiglass to the center of the bottom of the vessel
· Let completely dry for at least 24 hours
Thursday, September 30, 2010
Testing Procedures
Testing Procedure for Final Design:
Place the vehicle in the water at the site
Have the person controlling the vehicle on the shore
Have the person controlling the camera on the shore
Start operating the vehicle
Begin taking the video
Move the vehicle in at least a thirty square foot radius, video taping the entire time
Bring the vehicle back to the shore
Develop the video
Get the video to the client for research on the benthic creatures
Testing Procedure for Individual Design:
Place the vehicle in the testing location
Test all functions and controls to ensure that they work properly
Meet with the team to discuss what worked or did not work
Survey for Testing:
Did the vessel float?
How much water, if any, did the vessel take on?
Did the vessel move in all intended directions?
Place the vehicle in the water at the site
Have the person controlling the vehicle on the shore
Have the person controlling the camera on the shore
Start operating the vehicle
Begin taking the video
Move the vehicle in at least a thirty square foot radius, video taping the entire time
Bring the vehicle back to the shore
Develop the video
Get the video to the client for research on the benthic creatures
Testing Procedure for Individual Design:
Place the vehicle in the testing location
Test all functions and controls to ensure that they work properly
Meet with the team to discuss what worked or did not work
Survey for Testing:
Did the vessel float?
How much water, if any, did the vessel take on?
Did the vessel move in all intended directions?
Specs & Limitations
Specs:
The vessel must have a see through bottom
The see through bottom of the vehicle should have a wooden frame
The vessel must be able to float
The vessel must stay balanced at all times
The vessel should have no leaks or places where leaks can occur
The vessel must be remote control operated
The vessel must be operated by a member of the team while on shore
The vessel must be able to support the weight of the camera system
Environment for Use: shallow water bay
Condition of Solution: in motion
User/ Consumer: benthic organism researcher
Limitations:
Minimize cost
Minimize materials
The vessel can not be larger than 4 feet by 4 feet
Power Restrictions: motor and battery must be able to handle moving something the size and weight of the vessel plus the camera apparatus
Rationale Report
Criteria | Glass Bottom Canoe | Fully Glass Vehicle | Vehicle with Glass Bowl on Bottom | Glass Flat-Bottom Vehicle |
Ease of Use | S | - | S | + |
Aesthetic Appeal | + | + | - | + |
Manufacturability | - | - | + | + |
Low Weight | + | - | + | - |
Energy Efficient | - | + | - | + |
Safety | - | - | S | S |
∑+ | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
∑- | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
∑S | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Net Score | -1 | -2 | 2 | 3 |
Rank | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
Continue or Combine? | No | No | Combine | Yes |
Alternative solution number one is the glass bottom canoe shaped boat. The advantages of this boat are that it is easy to design and light weight. The disadvantages of this design are that it would be extremely difficult to manufacture and it is not very energy efficient. Since the canoe has a rounded body, the entire body would need to be made of glass. This would be difficult to manufacture, maneuver, and would also make it heavier to propel through the water. There are other glass bottom canoes that have been made. Figures one and two show a glass bottom canoe.
![]() |
| Figure 1- plexiglass bottom canoe |
![]() |
| Figure 2- plexiglass bottom boat |
Alternative solution number two is the completely glass cube vehicle. This idea is certainly feasible but not as easily done as the rest. The advantage of this boat would be that it would be completely clear in the water. The fish and marine life would not see it and be scared away, thus giving you a more accurate estimation of what creatures are living there. It would be a very aesthetically appealing vehicle. It would have a very modern and technologically advanced look to it. The disadvantage to this vehicle is that it would be very difficult to manufacture. It also uses more glass than the other alternative solutions.
Alternative solution number three is the vehicle with the glass bowl on the bottom. Initially this is the design that we were going to go with for our final solution. However we realized that the cons outweighed the pros. While the bowl on the bottom would keep the boat balanced, it causes a bigger hazard. If the boat hits a rock the bowl could crack and shatter. Also the bowl would create a glare from the sun in some spots while the camera is rotating.
The final solution is the glass bottom boat with a flat bottom. This vehicle is easy to use, has an aesthetic appeal, and is easily manufacturable. It is not as low eight as alternative solutions number three though. This solution is much less likely to break if it hits the bottom since it is flat. The boat would be floating in the water so it would not come into contact with shallow rocks.
After considering the pros and cons of each one of these solutions, the one that my team and I chose was the glass bottom boat with a flat bottom. This came in first place in the ranking chart. It has the most advantages in building and using this solution and was the most energy efficient. It has an aesthetic appeal because it is sleek. The bottom picture shhows the final solution.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)























